Autolay LogoAUTOLAY
Flooring Calculator
Automated Flooring
Create a flooring planFree to start
Getting StartedTutorialGuides
Try Demo
Floor Plan3D ScanBIM
Floor-Laying RobotProcessTechnologyBooking ServicesRobot Dashboardsign in
Autolay
Flooring Calculator
Create a flooring planGetting StartedTutorialGuides
Try Demo
Floor Plan3D ScanBIM
Automated Flooring
Floor-Laying RobotProcessTechnologyBooking ServicesRobot Dashboardsign in
Language
Autolay Logo
AUTOLAYAutomated Flooring

Company

About UsNewsletter

Service

Customer ServiceOur ServicesAPI for developers
© 2026 Autolay. All rights reserved.
ImprintPrivacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsRevocation PolicyCookies

We value your privacy

We use cookies for website statistics (Google Analytics).

We use cookies to analyze our website traffic using Google Analytics and improve your experience. You can read more about how we handle your data in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

"Accept All" turns on Google Analytics with cookies so we can see how the site is used. "Accept Essential Only" sets no analytics cookies and does not recognise your device — your visit is only counted anonymously, without cookies.

Floor plan with a generated laying plan
Tool comparison

Looking for a TilePro Calculator alternative?

TilePro Calculator is free, fast to a cut list, and has more patterns than anything else we audited. Here is where it is ahead, where it stops, and what AUTOLAY does instead.

Open the planner with a sample plan →

What TilePro Calculator does well

Ten built-in patterns plus a custom builder — the widest pattern range of the four tools in the audit, ours included. Rectangles, hexagons and triangles, staggering, and free rotation between −90° and +90°. The results end in a printable per-piece cut list and a PDF download, and on that cut list it scores above us: ours is still a partial.

It is free and says so plainly on the page, which is more than our own pricing does today — another checkpoint where it beats us. There is a size guide with standard tile sizes, custom and L-shaped rooms, an obstacle tool for recesses, and a cost estimator that gives you a total without an account.

The audit, side by side

Twelve checkpoints from the same audit, scored by hand in both tools. TilePro Calculator wins two of them and ties three more.

Interface audit of 2026-07-24; the competing tool was last exercised on 2026-07-24.
CheckpointTilePro CalculatorAUTOLAY
Undo and redopartialpartial
Trace an image or PDF underlaynonefull
Import a floor-plan file (PDF, IFC/BIM, 3D scan)nonefull
Product presets and cataloguepartialfull
Set the starter piece lengthnonenone
Set the minimum piece lengthnonefull
3D viewnonepartial
Offcut reuse shown in the plannonefull
Cost totalfullfull
Per-piece cut listfullpartial
CSV or data exportpartialfull
Pricing stated plainlyfullpartial
Seconds from landing page to first result3415
Clicks and entries to first result3112
Laying patterns offered107
Interface languages17

full = present and best in class · partial = present but limited · none = not found in the running app.

Where AUTOLAY differs

The cost total is a tie — both tools give you one. The real gap is the plan. TilePro Calculator has no file import of any kind and no image or PDF underlay to trace, so every room is retyped from the tape measure, and it took 31 entries to reach the first result in our run. AUTOLAY reads a floor-plan image, a PDF, an IFC/BIM model or a 3D scan and pulls the outline out of the file.

The second gap is waste. TilePro Calculator shows no offcut reuse and has no minimum piece length, so the plan cannot tell you which cut piece starts the next row. AUTOLAY colours the reused offcuts into the plan and lets you set the shortest piece you are willing to lay. It also runs in seven interface languages; TilePro Calculator runs in one.

Which one you should use

Stay with TilePro Calculator if you want the broadest choice of tile patterns for free, work in English, and mostly need a printable cut list at the end. Its cut list is more detailed than ours and it costs nothing.

Switch if the room arrives as a plan file, if offcut reuse and a minimum piece length are what decide your material order, or if you need the tool in German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch or Italian.

TilePro Calculator belongs to its makers and is named here for comparison only. The scores are ours, from a hands-on run, and a product can change any day.

Questions people ask before switching

Does AUTOLAY cost anything?
The planner, the layout, the quantities and the cost total run in the browser without an account. TilePro Calculator states "free forever" more plainly than our pricing page does today, and the audit scores it above us for that.
Can I still enter the room by hand?
Yes — typing exact dimensions works the same way, and both tools score full marks on it. Importing a file is the option TilePro Calculator does not have at all: it scored zero on file import and zero on tracing an image or PDF.
Where do these scores come from?
From a hands-on run of both tools on one identical reference room on 24 July 2026, using the custom-shape editor and the obstacle recess in TilePro Calculator. Every checkpoint was exercised in the running app, never read off a marketing page.

Try your own plan in AUTOLAY

The planner opens with a sample floor plan already loaded — swap in your own PDF, IFC model or scan.

Open the planner with a sample plan →

Other comparisons

  • floorplanning.app compared
  • CalcuFloor compared

Flooring guides

Learn how autolay measures, plans and prices a floor:

  • Flooring Take-off from BIMCalculate a flooring material take-off straight from an IFC/BIM model: how Autolay reads room boundaries from IfcSpace geometry instead of manual re-tracing.
  • Flooring from 3D ScanCalculate flooring material straight from a LiDAR or 3D scan: how Autolay turns a point cloud into a room boundary and a material take-off.
  • Exact vs rule of thumbWhy a simulated laying plan beats the flat 5–15% waste allowance — and how to get exact plank and pack counts for any room and pattern, free.

All guides →